Dr Canute Thomspon wrote in the Jamaica Observer of Friday, April 24, 2020 a piece in which he sought to be balanced in his critique of the current administration. I have sought here in part one to address two of the things he said were poorly executed. I will address the others in another piece. The link to his original article is at the bottom
My responses are in italic
Canute’s claim
There are at least four major areas in which the Government’s performance is weak or very weak, and even bordering on frighteningly worrying. These are:
- The decision not to have closed call centers earlier: The Government decided not to implement a complete lockdown of call centers, one of the most densely populated work settings. At the time of writing, nearly 70 reported cases were found to be connected to that arena. By the time this piece gets published they may be on temporary lockdown, but the horses would have already left the stable.
Commonsense response.
On what basis were the call centers to be closed prior them are having a single case when according to the monitoring program
- The particular call center in question was inspected and passed all its inspection
- They appeared to (at the time of inspection) was observing all protocols to protect the staff.
- There were no cases of Covid -19 detected nor did the contact tracing point to employee at these centers having come into contact with a positive case.
- There are 70 call centers across the country, and of the 70 only 1 had a problem so prior to this, what would have been the justifiable cause which could withstand a court challenge by the operators.
- Call centers provide critical services to power many industries, based on risk analysis at the time, apart from work space density, what other credible reason could have been posited to have them closed that could beat a court challenge. I know you are thinking well what about schools there were no cases and they were closed. Well its because kids are kids and no not posses the abilities resident in in adults to recognize risk and take action to prevent them.
The workspace density alone at the time was not and could not have by itself provided a sound basis on which to close all 70 BPO.
I notice you said closed all and not a partial closure, which shows a clear lack on understanding of the importance of the BPO sector and the services they provide to the public. This lack of understanding would definitely have resulted in this significant error of judgment on your part and the prescription which you have sought to provide. I guess by now having heard all the BPO did and the fact that article was done weeks ago , according to your tweet this morning, you would have recognized the folly of your decision to shutter all BPO and not instead recommend a partial shutdown. This failure on your path is due in part to your failure to conduct proper research and instead your laser like focus on what you consider to be errors on the part of this government and which you salivate in highlighting.
Canute’s claim
(2) Inadequate personal protective equipment (PPEs): In his statement at the press conference at which the Government announced the confirmation of the first case, Health and Wellness Minister Christopher Tufton stated, inter alia: “On the readiness of the island’s health system, the ministry has assessed the readiness of our health facilities to meet the anticipated increase in demand on services [and] continues to address existing gaps, including with respect of additional supplies and equipment; though, at the present time, we have enough personal protective equipment in the island for our health facilities. We also have adequate stores of respiratory medicine for the next three months.”
While COVID-19 is novel, the coronavirus itself is not, and the standard infection control and prevention procedures apply to COVID-19. In 2015, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued guidelines for the management of the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Those guidelines, which would be known to the experts in the Ministry of Health and Wellness, and which have been reiterated since the advent of COVID-19, define health care workers as “…persons, paid and unpaid, working in health care settings whose activities potentially place them at risk for exposures to a patient… Examples of such activities include those that require direct contact with patients and exposure to the patient-care environment, including: being in the patient, triage, or examination room, or other potentially contaminated areas; and handling blood, body fluids (except sweat), secretions, excretions, or soiled medical supplies, equipment or environmental surfaces”. In short, almost every employee at a hospital or other health facility falls into that definition. The PPEs those workers would need include gloves, gowns, respiratory protection including respirator N95 masks, eye protection, heavy duty gloves, shoe covers, etc. Less than two weeks after the minister’s March 10 statement that there were enough PPEs at health facilities to serve for three months, there were reports of a shortage. A few weeks later we were begging money to buy PPEs.
So, one must ask if the Minister knew what he is talking about.
Commonsense Response
Prior to Covid-19 and having been into healthcare care facilities here in Jamaica and around the world, have you observed all healthcare workers as you have described above in the following under normal conditions (here I include Porters and nurses in Triage)
- N95 Masks
- Heavy duty gloves
- Gowns
- Eye protection
- Shoes cover
Now would you find all the above in high risk areas such as those in ICU, operating theater, recovery wards, highly infections wards etc. The answer is a resounding yes.
In your normal planning process for purchases and what is kept in storage , this would be based on making an assessment of how many high risk areas you have across all public health facilities , the number of people who would need to access these facilities and how many you would need per person as well as safety stocks.
In your planning and response for Covid at that point in time, you would then examine, and make a guess of how much more you would need for your initial response. If what you have on hand can go for x period of time you would state so, which is exactly what was done, with the Minister going on to say (captured in Canute’s statement) here (SIC)
“On the readiness of the island’s health system, the ministry has assessed the readiness of our health facilities to meet the anticipated increase in demand on services [and] continues to address existing gaps, including with respect of additional supplies and equipment; though, at the present time, we have enough personal protective equipment in the island for our health facilities. We also have adequate stores of respiratory medicine for the next three months.”
So, we had enough on hand to meet what we think is going to happen at the onset, but we recognize there are some gaps and we plan to order more, I have highlighted that in bold above taken directly from Canute’s article
Where is this statement can you say there was a failure to recognize and procure PPE.
I did not want to go there but to make a point I will have to.
How many countries on the planet had enough PPE on hand at the start of this crises and never need to order any additional amounts and the case load increased and as they recalculated what was required.
Was there a widely accepted fact that the world was short on PPE and companies had to stop making their usual product and began making, PPE, why would that have been the case.
This cannot be considered a management failure instead it’s a recognition that the scale of the problem is bigger than you would have estimated and has to now take steps to align resources to the new reality
I will leave it here for now as I see to complete lay bare Canute’s false claims in trying to make a case for leadership failure.
Bless
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/opinion/exploring-lessons-from-covid-19-part-2_192217?profile=1096
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a comment »