Even with increasing eligible electors the number of PNP electors have been declining for the last 6 elections and this is likely to continue into the 2016 election
See TABLE
| Year | PNP Electors % |
| 1980 | 35.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 43.9% |
| 1997 | 36.4% |
| 2002 | 30.5% |
| 2007 | 30.3% |
| 2011 | 28.2% |
| 2016 |
Will give seat count tomorrow.
Filed under: Politics, Uncategorized |
,,,,,,:”the number of PNP electors have been declining for the last 6 elections and this is likely to continue into the 2016 election.”
Are we to assume that the number of JLP “electors” have been increasing over the same time period and hence, the reason for you very optimistic prediction? Why wasn’t the JLP numbers included in the table? This seem like a common sense thing to do, at least for the sake of completeness.
At any rate, I have grown accustom to your sloppy ways of doing things, especially when you want to make a point based on fiction. Unlike you, I’m prepared to give my election prediction now (based solely on gut instinct, as opposed to pulling random numbers out of the air).
PNP 50,
JLP 13
I think you have big gut. That number is so inflated. Landslide win for the PNP, but I wont be that generous for the JLP. JLP -40 , PNP 23.
Check the EOJ website
Dennis I gave you one week to come back here and apologize for even questioning someone like me who knows so much more than you do.
Now that I have been proven correct you have gone into hiding . Poor comrade did not even know what hit him.
Wayne Jnr please come out of hiding.
I know you are all ashamed but is so it go
Jay is one of few to predict a JLP. win